Friday 2 October 2020

Why did pre-Kannada and pre-Telugu language speakers not abandon their languages to shift to the official Prakrit during the early historic period?

The linguists of India have ,over a period of time used many words for referring to Tamil or to avoid the usage of the word Tamil. It’s surprising to observe that the word Tamil is not found even in essential references about languages of India.

The substitute words invented for this purpose are:

  • Prakrit
  • Dravida
  • Devanagari
  • Neesha Bhasha
  • Pracya,
  • Bahliki,
  • Daksinatya,
  • Sakari,
  • Candali,
  • Sabari,
  • Abhiri,
  • Dramili,
  • Odri.
  • Many such alibi words.

Since Tamil is spoken/written from time immemorial in India,if there’s any page on the Indian languages and if Tamil does not figure there,be sure that some other substitute word is used in its place.

Take for example,the Wiki page on Prakrit vide Prakrit - Wikipedia .The entire page does not have a single word ‘Tamil’ any where! So,was Tamil,a pan-Indian language, not present at the relevant period ? If ‘Prakrit’ was a language ,were there native speakers called’Prakruts’? History does not support any such inference.

So,what exactly does the word ‘Prakrit’ mean ?We all know that the word ‘Sanskrit’ is derived from Tamil words ‘Samam=Levelled+Kirukku=Script’ i.e. ‘Refined Script’. Similarly ,the word ‘Prakrit’ is derived from 2 Tamil words’Pira=Other+Krit=Kirukku(Script)’ i.e. ‘Miscellaneous Scripts’.These miscellaneous languages were dialects/variations of Tamil only.

The pre-Kannada,pre-Telugu,pre-Malayalam people should have spoken Tamil obviously.The evolution of these languages from Tamil is visible through the history.

(Originally published in Quora) 

Why is Tamil called the mother of Dravidian languages, and why not Malayalam, Telugu, or Kannada?

 A section of linguists are of the view that Tamil is the mother of many languages including the so-called Dravidian languages(sic).The timeline of the history of the major southern languages is roughly as under:

  • Tamil——Conservative estimate circa 5000 B.C. as Tamil is the Indus Valley language.Earliest around 10000 B.C. at least as proved by the work Pranava Vedam by MaMuni Mayon
  • Telugu—-Circa 400 B.C .Bhattiprolu inscriptions
  • Kannada—Circa 230 B.C. Ashokan edicts at Brahmagiri
  • Malayalam—Earliest branching could be by circa 9th c.A.D.

The timeline clearly establishes the mother hood of Tamil over the other languages.

The hypothesis of a language called ‘proto- Tamil’ having existed and all these languages descending from the same is untenable for the following reasons:

  • Linguists believe that there are no valid grounds to infer the existence of any mother to Tamil as its etymology,grammar,syntax etc. is complete and leaves no scope for such a belief.
  • For argument sake,if it is accepted that a ‘proto-Tamil’ language existed and all these languages descended from it,then all languages should be of same age which is not true here. No language can descend from a mother language after a gap of more than 1000 years.
  • If ‘proto-Tamil’existed,it should be like Tamil’s mother .Then,how can Telugu,Kannada,Malayalam be born out of grand-mother directly?ask linguists.
  • Any ‘proto-language’ exists before the concerned language comes into shape. In other words,any proto-language is an unrefined,raw form of language that disappears after the concerned language is formed.So,linguists feel that claiming that proto-Tamil existed after Tamil was formed and other languages descended from it is untenable.

TIME LINE ASSUMING PROTO-TAMIL EXISTED:

  • Proto-Tamil(?)—circa 5500 B.C.
  • Tamil——Conservative estimate circa 5000 B.C. as Tamil is the Indus Valley language.Earliest around 10000 B.C. at least as proved by the work Pranava Vedam by MaMuni Mayon
  • Telugu—-Circa 400 B.C .Bhattiprolu inscriptions
  • Kannada—Circa 230 B.C. Ashokan edicts at Brahmagiri
  • Malayalam—Earliest branching could be by circa 9th c.A.D.

Gap between Proto-Tamil and Telugu is 5100 years,Kannada is 5300 years and Malayalam is 6400 years.How can a language descend from Proto-language after such a long gap?is the question posed by linguists.

CORE DICTION DEDUCTION TECHNIQUE(CDDT)

Extracts from https://www.quora.com/Which-is-the-mother-of-Sanskrit-language/answer/Alvaro-Hans?__filter__=&__nsrc__=2&__snid3__=3321603133

Surprisingly,there’s no subject called ’Motherology’in Linguistics that would help us trace the mother of any language!Nevertheless,some linguists have recently formed certain ground rules to identify the mother language of any language in question.

’CDDT’ (Core Diction Deduction Technique) lists out a few ground rules for the purpose.

What are the rules?

1.The fore most deciding rule is the presence of common core words between the ‘mother’ and the ’daughter’ languages discussed.List of ’Core diction’ is furnished elsewhere.

2. The chronological precedence of the ‘mother language’ needs to be established beyond reasonable doubt.

3. The ‘mother language’in question should have identifiable lot of ’native speakers’ to prove independent origination and spoken status as of now.

What are the core words/core diction for the exercise?

When any language ‘originates’the first words to originate are all ‘verbs’ normally.For example, core verbs like’come,go,sit,eat’ etc originate first followed by core nouns like’food,water,mom,dad,brother,sister’etc.’.

Linguists are of the view that a language is original if at least 90% of the following core diction A is proved to be original,meaning its ’own’.The view is based on the understanding that ‘verbs’ are the drivers of spoken basics and no language can originate without its own verbs.’Nouns’ may be borrowed from any language from any where.

A-Core Verbs

1. Go

2. Come

3. Run

4. Sit

5. Eat

6. Pee

7.Shit

8. Stand

9. Lie

10. Sleep

11. Bath

12. Drink

13. Fuck

B- Core Nouns

14. Man(Person)

15. Woman(Female)

16. Mom

17. Dad

18. Wife(my woman)

19. Food

20.Water

21. Brother

22. Sister

23. Hot

24. Cold

25. Fire

26. Good

27. Bad

28. God

29. Fear

30. Sad

31. Dog

32. Cow/Bull

33. Animal

34. Cave/Home

35.Tree

36. River

37. Forest

38. Etc.

(This is a sample list only for illustrating the concept)

However,if 90% of the core diction of Daughter language D is derived from another chronologically older mother language M,then it can be safely concluded that the second language M is the ‘Mother language’ of the first language D.

An illustration would help understand the CDD Technique better.

Let’s take a simple set of languages for easy understanding,say Tamil and Malayalam.

A-Core Verbs -TAMIL (Mother) MALAYALAM(Daughter)

1. Go ————-Po———————- Poaku

2. Come ——— Vaa——————- Varuka

3.Run ———— Odu—————— Oduka

4 Sit —————Iru ——————-Irukkuka

5. Eat ————- Unnu —————-Bhakshikkuga(Tamil-Patchi=consume)

6.Pee———— Onnukku ———— Pi(Tamil for shit)

7. Shit ————- Kakka————— Sirr ?

8. Stand———- Nil ——————- Nikku

9. Lie —————- Padu ————— Kitakkuka(Tamil-Kida=lie down)

10. Sleep(v)——— Urangu ———- Urakka

11.Bath(v) ————Kuli ————- Kulikku

12. Drink ———— Kudi————- Kudikku

13. Fuck———— Okka ————- Umpi(Tamil-Oombu=suck)

Almost 95% matching is seen in this study.Some words may not match exactly as another equivalent word of M language may be used in D language, like for ‘eat’.Sometimes phonetic changes in D words may disguise the words from immediate recognition .

Most of the words in B List Core Nouns are also likely to match thus strengthening the relationship.However B List words are prone to undergo more changes with time and varied cultural contacts..So B List matching may be considered as supplementary/additional/extra proof only.

Tamil is the oldest surviving language of the world and possibly the language of the Tower of Babel vide https://www.quora.com/What-would-be-the-first-language-if-all-languages-were-born-from-the-Tower-of-Babel/answer/Alvaro-Hans . So,Indians can feel proud that India is the home to the oldest language of the world.


Those who put up edit suggestions are requested to submit their thoughts as a separate answer as I have more than 1100 answer drafts to work on and so,not in a position to spare time for edit suggestions.Thanks for your understanding.

Are the sounds "Ha", "Sha", and "Ja" native to Proto-Dravidian?

 Let us not continue to mislead the learned Quoran community with imaginary terms like Dravidian,Proto-Dravidian etc These terms were used by mistake by Bishop Caldwell,Francis White at a time when linguistics in India was just evolving.Now,things are clear with muddy waters settling down..Linguists are now certain there is nothing called Dravida itself vide Alvaro Hans's answer to Why are there 2 different language families in India? Indo Aryan and Dravidian? .When Dravidian itself is proved to be non-existent,linguists raise a question on why talking about Proto-Dravidian. Please read Geetha Thirumalai's answer to What is the origin of the Proto-Dravidian language*? Has its ancestry been traced linguistically, geographically and politically? for more in this regard.

Hence,any reference to Proto-Dravidian may be taken as referring to Tamil,world’s oldest surviving language.The sounds ‘Ha,Sha,Ja’ are found in Tamil but pronounced so according to natural phonetics.

Examples:

  • Sundar சுந்தர் is pronounced as ‘Shundhar’ while Chuttipayal சுட்டிப் பயல் is pronounced as Chuttipayal and not Shuttipayal.
  • Aaharam ஆகாரம் is pronounced as Aaharam and not Aakaram.
  • Jannal ஜன்னல் is pronounced as Jannal.
  • (Originally published in Quora)